Submission Information 投稿信息

Paper Submission 文章投稿: 

Authors are invited to submit an unpublished original work that must not have been submitted to an other conference, workshop or journal. All papers will be peer-reviewed by members of the Program Committee and be evaluated for originality, significance of the contribution, technical correctness and presentation.

 The paper should be no less than 8 pages. The paper is limited with 12 pages, including figures, tables & references (Additional pages will be permitted at the cost of $70 per additional page).
提交的文章需不少于8页。超过12页的部分将收取论文超页费500元/页。

The paper length allowed is a maximum of 12 (twelve) pages, in single column using ACM Conference template. 提交的论文最多不能超过12页，请按照ACM的论文格式来准备您的文章。

Download Paper Template 论文模版下载

Submission Methods:

1. Electronic Submission System 在线投稿链接

欢迎通过iconf.在线投稿系统进行投稿。

2. Contact Email: 
For any inquiry about the submission and conference, please feel free to contact us at: icbde@academic.net

文章作者可以选择两种投稿方式：

全文 (10页以内, 文章超过12页需加收每页500元超页费).
摘要 (只考虑做口头报告或者海报展示，不希望发表文章的作者可以只投摘要)
录用并注册的全文将收录在会议论文集中，会议期间还将从每一个分会报告中选出一位最佳口头报告.

文章接收之后根据审稿意见的要求可能要求修改终稿，终稿应按照文章模板排版，提交终稿后不能修改.

投稿，注册相关，信息咨询等，请联系会议邮箱：icbde@academic.net

Review 论文审稿:

The Committees of ICBDE 2022 invest great efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the conference and organising the sessions to enable the participants to gain maximum benefit.
By submitting a paper to ICBDE, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Conference Committee, who will give detailed comments and — if the submission gets accepted — the authors submit a revised ("camera-ready") version that takes into account this feedback.
All papers are reviewed using a single-blind review process: authors declare their names and affiliations in the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but reviewers do not know each other's identities, nor do the authors receive information about who has reviewed their manuscript.

 
Peer Review 同行评审:

Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the science reported. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the journal manuscripts they review—they offer authors free advice.

Through the peer-review process, manuscripts should become:

More robust: Peer reviewers may point out gaps in your paper that require more explanation or additional experiments.

Easier to read: If parts of your paper are difficult to understand, reviewers can tell you so that you can fix them. After all, if an expert cannot understand what you have done, it is unlikely that a reader in a different field will understand.

More useful: Peer reviewers also consider the importance of your paper to others in your field and can make suggestions to improve or better highlight this to readers.

 Dual/Double Submissions 重复投稿:

By submitting a manuscript to ICBDE, authors acknowledge that it has not been previously published or accepted for publication in substantially similar form in any peer-reviewed venue with publicly accessible papers, including journals, conferences, workshops, or other peer-reviewed, archival forums. Furthermore, no paper substantially similar in content has been or will be submitted to another peer-reviewed conference or workshop with publicly accessible papers during the review period. The authors also attest that they did not submit a substantially similar submission to ICBDE 2022. As a rule of thumb, the ICBDE submission should contain no more than 20 percent of material from previous publications. Violation of any of these conditions will lead to rejection.
 
 
Plagiarism 抄袭政策:

ICBDE is utterly intolerant of plagiarism. Submitted papers are expected to contain original work executed by the authors with adequate, proper and scholarly citations to the work of others. It is the job of the authors to clearly identify both their own contribution(s) and also published results / techniques on which they depend or build. Reviewers are charged to ensure these standards are met.
If the author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following acts of sanction will be taken:
1. Reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications.
2. Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s)
3. Report the authors violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research funding agency.
4. Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the plagiarist”.