While you're thinking of ICBDE 2023, we want to facilitate you with the smooth processes along with professional accurate information. Welcome researchers, academicians, industry experts or enthusiastic individuals in the related filed to submit paper.
To facilitate the submission process and the subsequent follow up the process, please consider the following guidelines, information, tips and terms mentioned.
Paper Submission 文章投稿:
Authors are invited to submit an unpublished original
work that must not have been submitted to an other
conference, workshop or journal. All papers will be
peer-reviewed by members of the Program Committee and be
evaluated for originality, significance of the
contribution, technical correctness and presentation.
The paper should be no less than 8 pages. The paper is
limited with 12 pages, including figures, tables &
references (Additional pages will be permitted at the
cost of $70 per additional page).
提交的文章需不少于8页。超过12页的部分将收取论文超页费500元/页。
The paper length allowed is a maximum of 12 (twelve)
pages, in single column using Conference template.
提交的论文最多不能超过12页，请按照ACM的论文格式来准备您的文章。
Paper Template 论文模版下载
Submission Methods
投稿方式：
1. Electronic Submission System 在线投稿链接
欢迎通过iconf.在线投稿系统进行投稿。
2. Contact Email:
For any inquiry about the submission and conference,
please feel free to contact us.
文章作者可以选择两种投稿方式：
全文 (12页以内, 文章超过12页需加收每页500元超页费).
摘要 (只考虑做口头报告或者海报展示，不希望发表文章的作者可以只投摘要)
录用并注册的全文将收录在会议论文集中，会议期间还将从每一个分会报告中选出一位最佳口头报告.
文章接收之后根据审稿意见的要求可能要求修改终稿，终稿应按照文章模板排版，提交终稿后不能修改.
投稿，注册相关，信息咨询等，请联系会议邮箱。
Review 论文审稿:
The Committees of ICBDE 2022 invest great efforts in
reviewing the papers submitted to the conference and
organising the sessions to enable the participants to
gain maximum benefit.
By submitting a paper to ICBDE, the authors agree to the
review process and understand that papers undergo a
peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by
appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by
the Conference Committee, who will give detailed
comments and — if the submission gets accepted — the
authors submit a revised ("camera-ready") version that
takes into account this feedback.
All papers are reviewed using a double-blind review
process: authors declare their names and affiliations in
the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but reviewers
do not know each other's identities, nor do the authors
receive information about who has reviewed their
manuscript.
Dual/Double Submissions 重复投稿:
By submitting a manuscript to ICBDE, authors acknowledge
that it has not been previously published or accepted
for publication in substantially similar form in any
peer-reviewed venue with publicly accessible papers,
including journals, conferences, workshops, or other
peer-reviewed, archival forums. Furthermore, no paper
substantially similar in content has been or will be
submitted to another peer-reviewed conference or
workshop with publicly accessible papers during the
review period. The authors also attest that they did not
submit a substantially similar submission to ICBDE 2022.
As a rule of thumb, the ICBDE submission should contain
no more than 20 percent of material from previous
publications. Violation of any of these conditions will
lead to rejection.
Plagiarism 抄袭政策:
ICBDE is utterly intolerant of plagiarism. Submitted
papers are expected to contain original work executed by
the authors with adequate, proper and scholarly
citations to the work of others. It is the job of the
authors to clearly identify both their own
contribution(s) and also published results / techniques
on which they depend or build. Reviewers are charged to
ensure these standards are met.
If the author is found to commit an act of plagiarism,
the following acts of sanction will be taken:
1. Reject the article submitted or delete the article
from the final publications.
2. Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s)
and affiliated institution(s)
3. Report the authors violation to the appropriate
overseeing office of academic ethics and research
funding agency.
4. Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the
title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated
institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the
plagiarist”.