Reviewers play a
pivotal role in scholarly publishing. The peer review
system exists to validate academic work, helps to
improve the quality of published research, and increases
networking possibilities within research communities.
ICBDE 2024 relies on the Double-blind peer review
process to uphold the quality and validity of individual
articles and the proceedings that publish them.
Double-blind review
Both the reviewer and the author are anonymous in this
model. Some advantages of this model are listed below.
▪ Author anonymity limits reviewer bias, for example
based on an author's gender, country of origin, academic
status or previous publication history.
▪ Articles written by prestigious or renowned authors
are considered on the basis of the content of their
papers, rather than their reputation.
The peer review process
